ART compared
Trauma therapies compared: ART, EMDR, CPT, PE and more, side by side
Eight approaches people are offered for trauma, in one table: what you actually do, whether you have to describe what happened, how long it usually takes, and what the major guidelines say.
The trauma therapies with the strongest research behind them are cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE) and EMDR. All three get the top “Strong for” rating in the 2023 VA/DoD guideline for PTSD. Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART) is a newer approach, studied in short courses of one to five sessions, with promising early research, but that guideline rates the evidence for it as insufficient to recommend for or against. The table below sets out the differences so you can see where each one fits.
I am trained in ART and in EMDR. I don’t provide CPT, PE, WET, Brainspotting or hypnotherapy, so where one of them would suit you better, that means finding a clinician trained in it. I would rather you had the full picture than only the part I offer.
The comparison table
| ART | EMDR | CPT | Prolonged exposure (PE) | Written exposure (WET) | Brainspotting | Hypnotherapy | Supportive / talk therapy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer and year | Laney Rosenzweig, LMFT, 2008 | Francine Shapiro, PhD, late 1980s (first paper 1989) | Patricia Resick and colleagues (first trial published 1992) | Edna Foa (first randomized trial 1991) | Denise Sloan and Brian Marx (first randomized trial 2012) | David Grand, PhD, 2003 | No single developer; a long-standing technique | No single developer, manual or protocol |
| What you do in session | Bring a scene to mind briefly while following sets of about 40 side-to-side eye movements until the body sensations ease, then replace the distressing images with a scene you choose | Hold a memory in mind while following a back-and-forth movement or sound, within an eight-phase protocol | Look at and change upsetting beliefs about the trauma (“stuck points”) through worksheets and discussion | Recount the memory aloud, repeatedly, and gradually face situations you have been avoiding | Write for about 30 minutes about one trauma memory, then briefly discuss it | Hold your gaze on an eye position (a “brainspot”) found with a pointer while mindfully noticing what comes up, often with bilateral sound | Enter a state of focused attention and use it to work toward change; methods vary | Talk through distress and current problems with a therapist who offers support, encouragement and reassurance |
| Do you describe the trauma in detail? | No. You recall it briefly, but you don’t have to tell the therapist the details | No, in most cases, though you think about it in session | Optional written account, from around session 3 | Yes, aloud, from around session 3 | Yes, in writing rather than aloud | Not clearly defined in published sources; you are invited to describe what you notice | Varies; no standard PTSD protocol | Not required |
| Homework | None | None | Yes: writing and worksheets | Yes: listening to session recordings and real-life practice | None | None described in published sources | Not defined | None |
| Typical course (per manuals or studies) | Studies used 1–5 sessions of about 60–75 minutes; averages of about 3.5–4 in the published studies | About 3 months of weekly 50- to 90-minute sessions | About 12 weekly sessions of 50–60 minutes | 8–15 weekly sessions of 60–90 minutes | 5 weekly sessions of about an hour | No standard course; the developer’s pilot study measured results after 3 sessions | No standard course for PTSD | Open-ended |
| VA/DoD 2023 PTSD guideline | Insufficient evidence: neither for nor against | Strong for | Strong for | Strong for | Weak for (“suggest”) | Not mentioned | Insufficient evidence: neither for nor against (“hypnosis or self-hypnosis”) | Insufficient evidence: neither for nor against (“supportive counseling”) |
| APA 2025 PTSD guideline | Not mentioned | Conditional (second-line) | Strong (first-line) | Strong (first-line) | Not among the recommended or suggested treatments | Not among the recommended or suggested treatments | Not among the recommended or suggested treatments | Not among the recommended or suggested treatments |
| Offered at The Denning Center | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Ongoing counseling, yes |
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
What the ratings mean
The VA/DoD guideline sorts treatments by how confident its reviewers are that the benefits outweigh the harms. “Strong for” means they recommend it. “Weak for” means they suggest it. “Neither for nor against” means the research wasn’t good enough to decide either way. That is not a finding that a therapy fails. It is a finding that the question hasn’t been answered well enough yet.
For ART, the guideline gives one specific reason: “No RCTs of ART included the critical outcome of clinician-rated PTSD.” The randomized trial of ART in veterans measured symptoms with questionnaires the participants filled in themselves, and it compared ART with a non-therapy control, not with another trauma treatment. There is more on this in what the guidelines say about ART and the 2013 trial.
The American Psychological Association’s 2025 guideline doesn’t mention ART at all, in either direction. It simply wasn’t reviewed. The international ISTSS guidelines don’t mention ART or Brainspotting, and they list hypnotherapy and supportive counseling as having insufficient evidence.
How to choose
Most people don’t need the single best therapy on paper. They need one they can start, stay with and finish. These are the questions that usually decide it.
- How strong do you want the evidence to be? If that matters most to you, start with CPT, PE or EMDR. That is a completely reasonable choice, and a good ART clinician should say so.
- How do you feel about telling the story? PE asks you to recount the memory aloud, session after session. WET asks you to write it. CPT makes a written account optional. EMDR and ART don’t require you to describe the details, though both involve bringing the memory to mind. See ART without talking about it.
- Can you do work between sessions? CPT and PE rely on homework. EMDR, WET and ART don’t use it. If your week has no room for worksheets or recordings, that is worth saying at the start.
- How much time can you commit? CPT, PE and EMDR usually run around three months of weekly sessions. WET is five sessions. ART studies used one to five sessions, but session length is often longer, and no clinician can tell you your number before assessing you. More in how many sessions ART takes.
- What have you already tried? If one approach stalled or you dropped out, trying something with a different procedure is a legitimate reason to choose it.
- Is it a specific memory, or life right now? Trauma-focused therapies work on memories. If what you need most is support with current relationships, work or safety, ongoing counseling may come first. See ART vs talk therapy.
The head-to-head comparisons
- ART vs EMDR: the two eye-movement therapies, from a clinician trained in both
- ART vs prolonged exposure: brief recall and image replacement versus repeated retelling
- ART vs cognitive processing therapy: working on images versus working on beliefs, and the unpublished trial
- ART vs Brainspotting: two EMDR offshoots with very different procedures
- ART vs hypnotherapy: whether ART is a form of hypnosis
- ART vs talk therapy: when ongoing counseling is the better fit, and combining them
If you’re considering ART
ART is worth considering if a specific memory keeps intruding, you would rather not narrate it, and you understand that its research base is smaller and younger than the guideline-recommended options. Screening comes first, because it isn’t right for everyone (see who ART is not for). If you would like to talk through whether it fits, you can get started here.
Questions people ask
What is the most effective therapy for trauma?
Which trauma therapies don’t make you talk about what happened?
Is ART recommended by the VA?
Is ART faster than other trauma therapies?
Can I switch trauma therapies if one isn’t working?
Sources
- VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of PTSD and Acute Stress Disorder, Version 4.0 (June 2023), full text — Recommendations 8, 9, 10 and 27; session formats p. 49
- American Psychological Association: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of PTSD in Adults (2025)
- ISTSS PTSD Prevention and Treatment Guidelines: Methodology and Recommendations (2019)
- VA National Center for PTSD: PTSD Treatment Decision Aid, alternative treatments
- Storey DP, Marriott ECS, Rash JA (2024), PLOS Mental Health: systematic review of ART for PTSD in adults
- Kip KE et al. (2013), Military Medicine: randomized trial of ART for combat-related PTSD
- Sloan DM, Marx BP et al. (2023), JAMA Psychiatry: written exposure therapy vs prolonged exposure
- Hildebrand A, Grand D, Stemmler M (2014): preliminary study of Brainspotting for PTSD — uncontrolled pilot, n = 22; the developer is a co-author
Read next
Next in ART comparedART vs prolonged exposure (PE): how they differ, and which has the stronger evidence
Written and clinically reviewed by Jim Denning, MA, LPC. Last reviewed September 24, 2026.
We review health content at least once a year, and sooner when clinical guidance, fees, insurance, or crisis information changes. Tell us if something here looks wrong.
You don’t have to do this alone.
Healing is possible. Tell us a little about what is going on and Jim will get back to you.
