Skip to main content

Is this time of year harder than it is supposed to be? Ways to get support over the holidays

The Denning Center — counseling and accelerated resolution therapy

ART compared

Trauma therapies compared: ART, EMDR, CPT, PE and more, side by side

Eight approaches people are offered for trauma, in one table: what you actually do, whether you have to describe what happened, how long it usually takes, and what the major guidelines say.

The trauma therapies with the strongest research behind them are cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE) and EMDR. All three get the top “Strong for” rating in the 2023 VA/DoD guideline for PTSD. Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART) is a newer approach, studied in short courses of one to five sessions, with promising early research, but that guideline rates the evidence for it as insufficient to recommend for or against. The table below sets out the differences so you can see where each one fits.

I am trained in ART and in EMDR. I don’t provide CPT, PE, WET, Brainspotting or hypnotherapy, so where one of them would suit you better, that means finding a clinician trained in it. I would rather you had the full picture than only the part I offer.

The comparison table

Eight trauma therapies compared (sources listed at the end of the page; checked September 2026)
ARTEMDRCPTProlonged exposure (PE)Written exposure (WET)BrainspottingHypnotherapySupportive / talk therapy
Developer and yearLaney Rosenzweig, LMFT, 2008Francine Shapiro, PhD, late 1980s (first paper 1989)Patricia Resick and colleagues (first trial published 1992)Edna Foa (first randomized trial 1991)Denise Sloan and Brian Marx (first randomized trial 2012)David Grand, PhD, 2003No single developer; a long-standing techniqueNo single developer, manual or protocol
What you do in sessionBring a scene to mind briefly while following sets of about 40 side-to-side eye movements until the body sensations ease, then replace the distressing images with a scene you chooseHold a memory in mind while following a back-and-forth movement or sound, within an eight-phase protocolLook at and change upsetting beliefs about the trauma (“stuck points”) through worksheets and discussionRecount the memory aloud, repeatedly, and gradually face situations you have been avoidingWrite for about 30 minutes about one trauma memory, then briefly discuss itHold your gaze on an eye position (a “brainspot”) found with a pointer while mindfully noticing what comes up, often with bilateral soundEnter a state of focused attention and use it to work toward change; methods varyTalk through distress and current problems with a therapist who offers support, encouragement and reassurance
Do you describe the trauma in detail?No. You recall it briefly, but you don’t have to tell the therapist the detailsNo, in most cases, though you think about it in sessionOptional written account, from around session 3Yes, aloud, from around session 3Yes, in writing rather than aloudNot clearly defined in published sources; you are invited to describe what you noticeVaries; no standard PTSD protocolNot required
HomeworkNoneNoneYes: writing and worksheetsYes: listening to session recordings and real-life practiceNoneNone described in published sourcesNot definedNone
Typical course (per manuals or studies)Studies used 1–5 sessions of about 60–75 minutes; averages of about 3.5–4 in the published studiesAbout 3 months of weekly 50- to 90-minute sessionsAbout 12 weekly sessions of 50–60 minutes8–15 weekly sessions of 60–90 minutes5 weekly sessions of about an hourNo standard course; the developer’s pilot study measured results after 3 sessionsNo standard course for PTSDOpen-ended
VA/DoD 2023 PTSD guidelineInsufficient evidence: neither for nor againstStrong forStrong forStrong forWeak for (“suggest”)Not mentionedInsufficient evidence: neither for nor against (“hypnosis or self-hypnosis”)Insufficient evidence: neither for nor against (“supportive counseling”)
APA 2025 PTSD guidelineNot mentionedConditional (second-line)Strong (first-line)Strong (first-line)Not among the recommended or suggested treatmentsNot among the recommended or suggested treatmentsNot among the recommended or suggested treatmentsNot among the recommended or suggested treatments
Offered at The Denning CenterYesYesNoNoNoNoNoOngoing counseling, yes

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Session counts are what manuals and studies describe, not a promise for any one person. ART session averages come from studies run mostly by researchers connected to ART’s development. APA 2025: first-line treatments are CPT, PE and trauma-focused CBT; second-line are cognitive therapy, EMDR and narrative exposure therapy. We could not confirm whether APA separately lists WET, Brainspotting, hypnotherapy or supportive counseling as having insufficient evidence, so the table says only that they are not among the treatments APA recommends or suggests.

What the ratings mean

The VA/DoD guideline sorts treatments by how confident its reviewers are that the benefits outweigh the harms. “Strong for” means they recommend it. “Weak for” means they suggest it. “Neither for nor against” means the research wasn’t good enough to decide either way. That is not a finding that a therapy fails. It is a finding that the question hasn’t been answered well enough yet.

For ART, the guideline gives one specific reason: “No RCTs of ART included the critical outcome of clinician-rated PTSD.” The randomized trial of ART in veterans measured symptoms with questionnaires the participants filled in themselves, and it compared ART with a non-therapy control, not with another trauma treatment. There is more on this in what the guidelines say about ART and the 2013 trial.

The American Psychological Association’s 2025 guideline doesn’t mention ART at all, in either direction. It simply wasn’t reviewed. The international ISTSS guidelines don’t mention ART or Brainspotting, and they list hypnotherapy and supportive counseling as having insufficient evidence.

How to choose

Most people don’t need the single best therapy on paper. They need one they can start, stay with and finish. These are the questions that usually decide it.

  1. How strong do you want the evidence to be? If that matters most to you, start with CPT, PE or EMDR. That is a completely reasonable choice, and a good ART clinician should say so.
  2. How do you feel about telling the story? PE asks you to recount the memory aloud, session after session. WET asks you to write it. CPT makes a written account optional. EMDR and ART don’t require you to describe the details, though both involve bringing the memory to mind. See ART without talking about it.
  3. Can you do work between sessions? CPT and PE rely on homework. EMDR, WET and ART don’t use it. If your week has no room for worksheets or recordings, that is worth saying at the start.
  4. How much time can you commit? CPT, PE and EMDR usually run around three months of weekly sessions. WET is five sessions. ART studies used one to five sessions, but session length is often longer, and no clinician can tell you your number before assessing you. More in how many sessions ART takes.
  5. What have you already tried? If one approach stalled or you dropped out, trying something with a different procedure is a legitimate reason to choose it.
  6. Is it a specific memory, or life right now? Trauma-focused therapies work on memories. If what you need most is support with current relationships, work or safety, ongoing counseling may come first. See ART vs talk therapy.

The head-to-head comparisons

If you’re considering ART

ART is worth considering if a specific memory keeps intruding, you would rather not narrate it, and you understand that its research base is smaller and younger than the guideline-recommended options. Screening comes first, because it isn’t right for everyone (see who ART is not for). If you would like to talk through whether it fits, you can get started here.

Questions people ask

What is the most effective therapy for trauma?

For PTSD, the treatments with the strongest guideline support are cognitive processing therapy, prolonged exposure and EMDR, which the 2023 VA/DoD guideline rates “Strong for.” The APA’s 2025 guideline puts CPT, PE and trauma-focused CBT first and EMDR second. No therapy works for everyone, and the fit between you, the method and the clinician matters too.

Which trauma therapies don’t make you talk about what happened?

EMDR and ART don’t require you to describe the trauma in detail, though both ask you to bring the memory to mind. Written exposure therapy has you write about it rather than say it aloud. CPT makes a written account optional. Prolonged exposure asks you to recount the memory aloud. More on ART without talking.

Is ART recommended by the VA?

No. The 2023 VA/DoD guideline says there is “insufficient evidence to recommend for or against” ART, because no randomized trial of ART measured PTSD with a clinician-rated assessment. That is different from a finding that it doesn’t work. ART is used in some military clinics, but being used is not the same as being recommended.

Is ART faster than other trauma therapies?

That hasn’t been shown. ART studies used 1 to 5 sessions, averaging about 3.5 to 4, while CPT, PE and EMDR are usually delivered over about three months. But no trial has compared them directly, the ART studies were mostly run by researchers connected to ART, and how long anyone needs depends on what happened and for how long.

Can I switch trauma therapies if one isn’t working?

Yes. Stalling in one approach is a legitimate reason to try one with a different procedure. It helps to tell the new clinician what you tried, how far you got and what made it hard, because that shapes what is likely to suit you next.

You don’t have to do this alone.

Healing is possible. Tell us a little about what is going on and Jim will get back to you.

CallGet started