Skip to main content

Is this time of year harder than it is supposed to be? Ways to get support over the holidays

The Denning Center — counseling and accelerated resolution therapy

ART compared

ART vs cognitive processing therapy (CPT): images versus beliefs

CPT works on what you have come to believe because of the trauma. ART works on the images the memory carries. CPT has one of the strongest evidence records of any PTSD treatment; ART’s is early.

Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is a structured talking-and-writing therapy that helps you examine and change the beliefs a trauma left behind, such as “it was my fault” or “nowhere is safe.” Accelerated Resolution Therapy (ART) uses eye movements and image replacement to reduce the distress a memory carries, without requiring you to discuss it. CPT has among the strongest evidence of any PTSD treatment and is rated “Strong for” by the 2023 VA/DoD guideline; ART is rated as having insufficient evidence to recommend for or against.

I am trained in ART and EMDR, not in CPT. If CPT is the better fit for you, that means a clinician trained in it, and I will say so if I think that is the case.

What CPT involves

CPT was developed by Patricia Resick and colleagues; its first published trial, with sexual assault survivors, appeared in 1992. The VA describes a course of about 12 weekly sessions of about 60 minutes (the CPT developers’ site says 50 minutes), although it is acceptable to adjust the number to the person.

The core of CPT is looking at how the trauma changed the way you think about yourself, other people and the world. You identify “stuck points,” the beliefs that keep the distress going, and work through them with worksheets and discussion. Common themes are safety, trust, power and control, esteem and intimacy.

At around the third session you have the option, with your therapist, of writing a detailed account of the trauma. The current protocol lets you choose whether to include it. Between sessions you complete writing and worksheets, so homework is a real part of CPT.

What ART involves

ART was developed in 2008 by Laney Rosenzweig, LMFT. It works less on beliefs and more on the sensory side of a memory. You briefly bring a scene to mind while following sets of about 40 side-to-side eye movements, with further sets to settle the physical sensations. Then, through Voluntary Image Replacement, you replace the distressing images with ones you choose. The narrative memory stays; what changes is the picture your mind goes to.

You don’t have to tell the therapist the details, and there is no homework. That doesn’t mean ART avoids the memory: brief deliberate recall is a core step. More in ART without talking about it.

Side by side

ART and cognitive processing therapy compared
ARTCPT
Developed byLaney Rosenzweig, LMFT, 2008Patricia Resick and colleagues; first trial published 1992
Main targetThe distressing images and body sensations tied to a memoryBeliefs about the trauma, yourself and the world (“stuck points”)
Describe the trauma?Not required; brief recall, aloud or silentlyOptional written account, from around session 3
HomeworkNoneWriting and worksheets between sessions
Typical courseStudies used 1–5 sessions of about 60–75 minutesAbout 12 weekly sessions of 50–60 minutes
Randomized trialsOne in PTSD (vs attention control) plus one in grief (vs wait-list)34 in the VA’s PTSD Repository
VA/DoD 2023Insufficient evidence: neither for nor againstStrong for
APA 2025Not mentionedStrong (first-line)

The evidence, plainly

CPT is about as well supported as a PTSD treatment gets. The VA’s professional guide notes 34 randomized trials in its PTSD Repository and says CPT “has the strongest recommendation as a treatment for PTSD in every clinical practice guideline.” The VA estimates that 57 out of every 100 people who receive CPT, PE or EMDR have meaningful improvement at about three months, against 8 out of 100 with no treatment.

ART has two randomized trials with published results. One (Kip and colleagues, 2013) compared ART with a non-therapy attention control in 57 service members and veterans, using self-reported symptoms. The other compared ART with a wait-list for complicated grief in 54 older caregivers. Both involved researchers connected to ART’s development. The VA/DoD guideline’s stated reason for its rating is that “No RCTs of ART included the critical outcome of clinician-rated PTSD.” A 2024 systematic review concluded ART “shows some promise” but “more high-quality studies are needed.”

Some practitioners have written side-by-side descriptions of ART, EMDR and CPT with case examples (Hernandez and colleagues, 2016). That paper states it was “not part of a formal study,” and one author is an ART trainer, so it describes the methods rather than testing them.

When CPT may be the better choice

  • You want a treatment with top-tier guideline support.
  • Guilt, self-blame, shame or a changed sense of trust or safety are at the center of what you are struggling with. Working directly on those beliefs is what CPT is built for.
  • You like structure, writing and working things through between sessions.
  • You have access to a clinician trained in CPT.

When ART may be worth considering

  • What bothers you most is intrusive images and the physical jolt of the memory, more than particular thoughts about it.
  • You would find worksheets or writing about the trauma hard to sustain.
  • You have tried CPT and it stalled or you stopped, and you want a different procedure.
  • You understand the evidence gap and are choosing ART knowingly.

On trying ART after CPT: an uncontrolled study of 148 veterans (Pang and colleagues, 2023) included 33 who had previously had CPT or PE. Among those who completed ART, the proportion with meaningful improvement was similar to that of veterans with no prior treatment. With no comparison group, completers-only figures and a research team connected to ART, this is a reason to consider it, not a prediction.

They aren’t mutually exclusive

Beliefs and images both matter after trauma, and people sometimes use more than one approach over time. What matters is that someone is keeping track of what is changing and what isn’t. The full comparison table shows CPT alongside the other options, and ART vs EMDR covers the other eye-movement therapy. If you would like to talk about whether ART suits your situation, you can get started here.

Questions people ask

Is CPT or ART better for PTSD?

CPT has much stronger evidence: dozens of randomized trials and the top rating in every major PTSD guideline. ART has two small randomized trials, neither against an active treatment, and a VA/DoD rating of insufficient evidence. A trial comparing the two directly finished in 2021, but its results haven’t been published, so how they compare head to head is unknown.

Do you have to write about the trauma in CPT?

No. Around the third session you are offered the option of writing a detailed account, and the current CPT protocol lets you decide whether to include it. You will still do other writing and worksheets between sessions. In ART there is no writing and no homework.

What happened to the ART vs CPT study?

The trial, NCT03384706, compared CPT, ART and a wait-list in 187 people and was completed in March 2021. As of September 2026 no results have been posted and no paper has been published that we could find. We will update this page if that changes.

Does ART deal with guilt and self-blame?

The 2013 randomized trial measured trauma-related guilt as a secondary outcome and found it fell more with ART than with the control. But CPT is designed specifically around beliefs like self-blame, and it has far more evidence. If guilt is central for you, CPT deserves serious consideration.

You don’t have to do this alone.

Healing is possible. Tell us a little about what is going on and Jim will get back to you.

CallGet started